How Much Does a Planet Fitness Franchise Owner Make?

Get Franchise Bundle
Get Full Bundle:
$79 $49
$99 $79
$49 $29

TOTAL:

Owner earnings answer
About $326,000 to $1.10 million per club annually

For one Planet Fitness franchised club that operated for the full 2025 calendar year, the strongest defensible manager-run estimate is approximately $326,000 in a conservative scenario, $707,000 in a base scenario, and $1.10 million in an upside scenario. These are EBITDA-style, pre-interest and pre-tax owner-earnings proxies after operating payroll and rent, but before debt service, personal taxes, depreciation, amortization, and future capital expenditures.

Evidence mode: Mode C - FDD-anchored scenario Confidence: Limited Unit: One U.S. franchised club Operating period: Calendar 2025
Independent estimate - not an Item 19 franchised-profit claim This range is an independent analytical scenario, not a financial performance representation of franchisee profit by Planet Fitness Franchising LLC. It combines official franchised-club EFT Revenue from the 2026 Franchise Disclosure Document with a separately identified company-operated EBITDA proxy and an owner-role wage benchmark. Actual results can differ materially because of location, membership sales, collection rates, labor, rent, required marketing, join fees, financing, owner involvement, equipment replacement, remodeling, and execution.
Data basis
Legal entityPlanet Fitness Franchising LLC; ultimate parent Planet Fitness, Inc. 2025 Form 10-K.
FDD2026 Planet Fitness FDD, issued May 22, 2026; Item 19, pp. 76-83; Item 20, pp. 84-93.
Item 19 statusOfficial franchised EFT Revenue is disclosed; complete franchised operating expenses and owner earnings are not.
Population2,291 U.S. franchised clubs, including Puerto Rico, open for the entire 12 months ended December 31, 2025.
ProxyMedian company-operated EBITDA divided by median company-operated Membership Sales - EFT within the corresponding revenue third.
CheckedJuly 18, 2026. See the official U.S. Planet Fitness franchise page.
Official
$1.31M-$2.60M
Median Annual EFT Revenue across thirds
Bottom-, middle-, and upper-third franchised medians were $1.312M, $1.863M, and $2.596M.
Official
2,291
Full-year franchised clubs
The Item 19 revenue population excludes newer, transferred, and closed clubs described below.
Derived
94.2%
Coverage of year-end franchised clubs
2,291 reporting clubs divided by 2,432 franchised clubs open at December 31, 2025.
Official
7%
Royalty on EFT Dues Draft
Item 6 states a 7% royalty on gross monthly and annual membership fees payable through EFT.
Official
Up to 9%
Combined NAF and LAF requirement
The 2026 FDD caps the combined National Advertising Fund and Local Advertising Funds requirements at 9% of EFT Dues Draft.
Item 19 evidence

What does the Planet Fitness FDD actually measure?

Officially, Item 19 measures Annual EFT Revenue, not owner earnings, for franchised clubs that operated throughout 2025. Annual EFT Revenue consists of recurring monthly and annual membership fees billed through electronic funds transfer. It excludes paid-in-full memberships, retail and other revenue, returns, and taxes.

Official franchised-club measure Bottom third Middle third Upper third
Clubs 764 764 763
Average Annual EFT Revenue $1,260,539 $1,873,231 $2,705,811
Median Annual EFT Revenue $1,311,575 $1,863,300 $2,595,549
Disclosed low-high range $429,581-$1,596,261 $1,597,497-$2,170,135 $2,171,673-$5,271,381
Clubs meeting or exceeding the third's average 437 / 764 (57%) 370 / 764 (48%) 296 / 763 (39%)
Revenue is not earnings
A club with $1.86 million of median EFT Revenue has not thereby produced $1.86 million for its owner. Payroll, rent, utilities, supplies, maintenance, insurance, marketing, royalty, collection losses, other operating expenses, capital obligations, and financing must be considered. Item 19 expressly says Planet Fitness does not receive complete expense information from franchisees, so it does not publish a franchised-club profit table.
Annual EFT Revenue
The FDD's recurring monthly and annual membership billing measure. It is revenue, not cash profit or owner compensation.
EBITDA-style owner earnings proxy
Estimated unit-level residual after the operating costs included in the company-operated Item 19 table, including payroll, rent, royalty, and marketing, but before interest, taxes, depreciation, amortization, debt service, and future capital expenditures.
Owner-operator benefit
Manager-run residual plus the wage value of a management role actually performed by the owner. The labor component is compensation for work, not passive business profit.
After-tax take-home pay
Not estimated. It depends on entity structure, jurisdiction, deductions, financing, and the owner's personal tax circumstances.

How representative is the Item 19 population?

The revenue table has broad coverage but represents established, full-year clubs rather than every 2025 outlet experience. It covers 2,291 of the 2,432 franchised clubs open at year-end, or 94.2%. The FDD excluded 133 clubs opened after January 1, 2025, eight clubs sold to franchisees in August 2025, and seven clubs that closed during 2025. Included clubs opened from 2003 through 2024.

Item 20 reports that U.S. franchised outlets increased from 2,298 to 2,432 during 2025, with 141 openings and seven terminations. That growth does not remove ramp-up risk: a new club's first-year revenue and cost structure may differ substantially from the full-year cohort.

Scenario model

How is the annual owner-earnings range calculated?

The estimate applies a same-tier company-operated EBITDA-to-EFT ratio to each franchised median EFT Revenue figure. This is a derived calculation using 2025 figures in the 2026 FDD. It is not a franchisor-reported franchisee profit result.

Estimated manager-run owner earnings = franchised median Annual EFT Revenue × corporate median EBITDA ÷ corporate median Membership Sales - EFT Matching bottom, middle, and upper revenue thirds keeps each scenario within a comparable same-brand performance band. Calculations use full-precision inputs and are rounded to the nearest $1,000 for publication.
Scenario and FDD anchor Franchised median EFT Revenue Corporate EBITDA-to-EFT proxy Estimated manager-run earnings
Conservative
Bottom-third medians
$1,311,575 24.86% $326,000
Base
Middle-third medians
$1,863,300 37.94% $707,000
Upside
Upper-third medians
$2,595,549 42.51% $1,103,000
Estimated manager-run earnings by scenario
The scenarios correspond to the FDD's bottom-, middle-, and upper-third median revenue cohorts; they are analytical anchors, not probabilities.
Planet Fitness estimated annual manager-run owner earnings Conservative estimate 326 thousand dollars, base estimate 707 thousand dollars, and upside estimate 1.103 million dollars. $0 $550k $1.1M $326k $707k $1.103M Conservative Base Upside
Interpretation: Revenue tier and operating margin interact strongly: the upper-third scenario is more than three times the conservative scenario. Source and formula: 2026 Planet Fitness FDD, Item 19, pp. 76-83. Franchised median EFT Revenue multiplied by the corresponding corporate median EBITDA divided by corporate median Membership Sales - EFT.

Why use the company-operated table as a proxy?

It is the closest same-brand cost evidence available, but it remains a proxy. The Item 19 corporate table covers 262 company-operated clubs and includes payroll, marketing, a 7% royalty adjustment, utilities, supplies and maintenance, miscellaneous expenses, and rent. The Planet Fitness 2025 Form 10-K also states that management believes franchisee four-wall adjusted EBITDA margins are generally in line with royalty-adjusted company-operated margins, based on franchisee business reviews and estimates.

The limitation is material: company-operated purchasing, staffing, insurance, lease terms, and management systems may differ from a franchisee's. The FDD also does not establish that the corporate and franchised clubs in each third occupy identical markets or cost structures. This reliance on a company-operated proxy is the principal reason for the Limited evidence-confidence label.

Owner role

How does owner involvement change the result?

A manager-run owner receives the modeled business residual, while a true owner-operator may also capture the wage value of a management job performed personally. The 2026 FDD does not present Planet Fitness owner salaries, draws, or distributions, so the labor component must remain separately labeled.

Item 15 requires an owner or Responsible Owner to manage and operate the business as a primary occupation unless Planet Fitness approves an Approved Operator. A club must always be managed by an owner, Responsible Owner, Approved Operator, or trained manager. This structure does not support treating ownership as automatically passive.

Manager-run residual versus owner-operator benefit
Owner-operator benefit adds a $46,690 wage-only benchmark when the owner fully replaces a paid recreation supervisor or manager role.
Manager-run earnings proxy Owner-operator benefit
Planet Fitness owner role earnings comparison For conservative, base, and upside scenarios, owner-operator benefit is approximately 47 thousand dollars above the manager-run earnings proxy. $0 $500k $1.0M $1.2M Conservative Base Upside $326k $373k $707k $754k $1.103M $1.150M
Interpretation: Owner operation changes compensation by the value of labor replaced, not by transforming operating profit. The $46,690 input is the May 2023 mean annual wage for First-Line Supervisors of Entertainment and Recreation Workers, Except Gambling Services, in NAICS 713900 from the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics. It excludes employer payroll taxes and benefits and may not match a specific Planet Fitness manager salary.
Owner-operator effect
The estimated owner-operator benefit becomes approximately $373,000, $754,000, and $1.15 million across the three scenarios only if the owner actually removes a paid management position without weakening operations. If a trained manager remains necessary, adding the wage benchmark would double count labor. None of these figures is passive income or after-tax take-home pay.
Fees and uncertainty

What can move actual cash earnings below the model?

The largest downward risks are rent and labor variation, franchise-specific fees not separable in the corporate table, financing, and major equipment or remodel obligations. These uncertainties are official or derived from the 2026 FDD, but their timing and club-level amounts are not disclosed for the franchised Item 19 population.

Which recurring franchise obligations are included or unresolved?

The company-operated EBITDA proxy includes royalty and marketing expense, but it does not resolve every franchisee-specific fee. The 2025 corporate table includes a 7% royalty adjustment, National Advertising Fund expense, local marketing, payroll, rent, utilities, supplies and maintenance, and miscellaneous operating costs. The current 2026 FDD changes the NAF/LAF mix but keeps the combined requirement at no more than 9% of EFT Dues Draft.

  • Royalty: 7% of total gross monthly and annual membership fees payable through EFT Dues Draft.
  • Advertising: during 2026, NAF is 2% of EFT Dues Draft plus 1% of gross Monthly EFT; LAF is the greater of $50,000 or 6% of cumulative Monthly EFT. Combined NAF and LAF requirements cannot exceed 9% of EFT Dues Draft.
  • Join Fee: 20% of the regular monthly membership fee or 5% of a prepaid membership price for each new membership. The Item 19 tables do not provide new-member counts and price mix, so this scenario does not separately quantify that charge.
  • Software: currently $100 per year, immaterial to the displayed rounded range but still an Item 6 obligation.
  • Debt and taxes: loan interest, principal payments, and personal income taxes are excluded from the earnings figures.

How much capital expenditure is missing from EBITDA?

Potentially substantial amounts are excluded. Item 6 estimates $333,000 to $995,000 for re-equipment every five to nine years and $250,000 to $1.2 million for a substantial remodel no more often than every 12 years under ordinary timing rules. The Item 19 EBITDA table expressly excludes reserves for these future capital expenditures.

Capital reserve sensitivity
Mechanically spreading the low-cost/long-interval endpoints and high-cost/short-interval endpoints produces a derived planning equivalent of about $58,000 to $299,000 per year. This is not an annual FDD fee or a prediction of timing. Applied only as a planning sensitivity, the $707,000 base EBITDA-style result would leave roughly $408,000 to $649,000 before financing and personal taxes. Actual replacement cycles, financing, construction costs, and lease obligations may differ materially.

Does multi-unit ownership make the per-club estimate scalable?

No simple multiplication is defensible. The per-club figures do not automatically become portfolio owner earnings because new-unit ramp-up, centralized overhead, regional managers, shared marketing, development timing, and debt structure change with scale. Planet Fitness, Inc. reports that approximately 98% of franchise clubs were owned by groups with at least three clubs at the end of 2025, reinforcing that a per-unit result is not a per-owner result. The SEC population is system-wide and broader than the U.S.-only FDD cohort, so it is used only to describe ownership structure, not to alter the earnings calculation.

Buyer verification

What should a prospective owner verify before relying on the range?

A buyer should replace every proxy with site-specific evidence wherever possible. The most important verification is whether the proposed club can support the expected membership billing while maintaining realistic local payroll, occupancy, marketing, collection, and capital costs.

  • Request the written substantiation for Item 19 and confirm the exact 2025 cohort definitions, exclusions, and calculations.
  • Ask current franchisees for club-level profit-and-loss statements that reconcile EFT Revenue to collected Net Revenue, EBITDA, owner compensation, debt service, and distributions.
  • Separate mature-club results from first-year and ramp-up performance; the official franchised revenue table excludes clubs that did not operate for the entire year.
  • Obtain local quotes for rent, wages, utilities, insurance, maintenance, and payment processing rather than adopting corporate medians.
  • Quantify the Item 6 Join Fee using expected new-member volume and membership mix, and confirm the current NAF, LAF, and special-marketing calendar.
  • Build a funded equipment and remodel reserve, then show loan interest and principal separately from unit-level EBITDA.
  • Confirm in writing whether an Approved Operator is permitted and whether owner operation can actually eliminate a paid management role.
  • Review Item 20 contacts and interview both current and former franchisees. The Federal Trade Commission's franchise-buying guide explains how Item 19 claims and Item 20 outlet information should be evaluated.
Decision synthesis

What is the strongest defensible earnings range?

The strongest defensible manager-run range is approximately $326,000 to $1.10 million per established, full-year franchised club, with a base scenario near $707,000. It is scenario-based, not an official Planet Fitness franchisee-profit disclosure. The most important earnings driver is the combination of recurring membership billing and the operating margin that remains after payroll and occupancy. The largest unresolved uncertainty is whether company-operated cost ratios, including franchise-specific charges and capital needs, match the buyer's location.

An actively working owner may produce an estimated owner-operator benefit about $47,000 higher only by genuinely replacing paid management labor. Before treating any amount as distributable cash, a buyer should verify Item 19 substantiation, actual franchisee profit-and-loss statements, current Item 6 fees, capital reserves, financing, and the proposed owner-management structure through written documentation and franchisee interviews.