How Much Does an OsteoStrong Franchise Owner Make?

Get Franchise Bundle
Get Full Bundle:
$79 $49
$99 $79
$49 $29

TOTAL:

Annual owner earnings answer
Manager-run: about −$46,000 to $35,000; owner-operator benefit: about $24,000 to $105,000

These are independent pre-tax scenarios for one mature U.S. OsteoStrong Center. The 2025 Franchise Disclosure Document does not report sales, profit, owner compensation, or another Item 19 financial performance measure, so no official owner-earnings figure exists.

2025 FDD Mode D: structural estimate Evidence confidence: LIMITED One U.S. Center, annual
Independent estimate

This range is an independent analytical scenario, not an Item 19 financial performance representation by OsteoStrong Franchising, Inc. It combines identified 2025 FDD facts with separately identified U.S. Census Bureau, IRS, and Bureau of Labor Statistics benchmarks and explicit scenario assumptions. Actual results can differ materially by location, sales, membership mix, labor, occupancy, financing, owner involvement, local demand, and execution.

Data basis

Legal franchisor: OsteoStrong Franchising, Inc. FDD: issued August 13, 2025. Item 19 status: no financial performance representation. Format: a single 1,100–1,800-square-foot U.S. wellness Center. Population: the FDD supplies no reporting sales or profit cohort; Item 20 lists 153 franchised Centers and no company-owned Centers at December 31, 2024. Evidence mode: structural FDD-anchored estimate. Benchmarks: 2023 Census NAICS 713940 revenue and establishment data, 2023 IRS sole-proprietorship income statements, and May 2024 BLS manager wages. Checked: July 20, 2026.

Primary FDD citation
2025 FDD, Item 19, p. 33
Owner-role citation
2025 FDD, Item 15, p. 26
Recurring-fee citation
2025 FDD, Item 6, pp. 6–9
Outlet-population citation
2025 FDD, Item 20, pp. 33–40
None
Official Item 19 earnings data

OFFICIAL — the 2025 FDD makes no financial performance representation.

153
Franchised Centers

OFFICIAL — year-end 2024 U.S. outlet count; no company-owned units were reported.

$954,013
Central revenue proxy

DERIVED BENCHMARK — 2023 NAICS 713940 employer revenue divided by employer establishments.

6.17%
Central net-income proxy

DERIVED BENCHMARK — IRS net income less deficit divided by receipts for a broader recreation industry.

8% + $8,988
Annual disclosed system-fee formula

OFFICIAL + DERIVED — royalty and advertising percentages plus three recurring fixed fees.

$70,270
Manager wage proxy

BENCHMARK — May 2024 BLS median wage for the closest industry-specific manager occupation.

Evidence confidence: LIMITED

The principal reason is that Item 19 supplies no same-brand revenue or earnings measure; the range therefore depends materially on broad government industry proxies and editorial sensitivity bands.

Item 19 evidence

What does the 2025 OsteoStrong Item 19 actually report?

Officially, it reports no financial performance representation. Item 19, p. 33, does not provide Gross Revenues, average unit volume, operating profit, EBITDA, net income, cash flow, owner compensation, or a percentage of Centers reaching a threshold. Revenue therefore cannot be inferred from the FDD, and revenue must not be confused with owner earnings.

The FDD does provide structural evidence. Item 20 reports 153 franchised Centers and zero company-owned Centers at the end of 2024, which removes a same-brand company-store proxy. Item 15 requires an approved, trained Center Manager to devote full-time best efforts to day-to-day operations; an owner may fill that role, but if a non-owner manager is used, a Managing Owner must still oversee general operations. The official OsteoStrong U.S. franchise page describes both single-Center owner/manager and multi-Center ownership models.

Revenue is not earnings

Because the FDD contains no sales figure, any annual earnings number must begin with an external revenue proxy. The result is an estimate, not a statement about what an average, median, mature, or newly opened OsteoStrong Center has actually achieved.

Scenario model

How were the annual owner-earnings scenarios built?

The scenarios combine a broad $954,013 central revenue proxy with a 6.17% central owner-operated net-income proxy. Both are derived from 2023 government data, not OsteoStrong results. Conservative and Upside cases use 80% and 120% of the central revenue proxy and move the margin down or up by 3 percentage points. Those spreads are editorial sensitivity assumptions, not probabilities or FDD-reported quartiles.

  • Revenue anchor — DERIVED BENCHMARK: $39.645 billion of 2023 employer revenue for NAICS 713940 Fitness and Recreational Sports Centers divided by 41,556 employer establishments equals $954,013 per establishment. The numerator comes from the 2023 Census Annual Integrated Economic Survey table; the denominator comes from the Census NAICS 713940 industry profile. This cross-program ratio is not a Census-published average and includes facilities unlike OsteoStrong.
  • Margin anchor — DERIVED BENCHMARK: 2023 IRS net income less deficit of $933.271 million divided by $15.122 billion of business receipts equals 6.17% for the broader Amusement, Gambling, and Recreation Industries sole-proprietorship group. The calculation uses loss-making returns rather than only profitable returns. See the IRS nonfarm sole-proprietorship statistics and 2023 IRS Table 2 income-statement workbook.
  • Owner-operator treatment — EDITORIAL SCENARIO: Schedule C net income does not deduct a sole proprietor's salary, so the modeled result is labeled estimated owner-operator benefit. It may combine residual business profit with the market value of the owner's work.
  • Manager-run treatment — EDITORIAL SCENARIO: the owner-operator benefit is reduced by a $70,270 wage-only proxy. BLS reported that May 2024 median wage for entertainment and recreation managers working in fitness and recreational sports centers. Employer payroll taxes, benefits, recruiting, and coverage costs are excluded, so the manager-run residual may be overstated. See the BLS manager wage profile.
Scenario and assumptions Revenue Owner-operator benefit Manager-run residual
Conservative
80% revenue proxy; 3.17% margin
$763,211 $24,205 −$46,065
Base
100% revenue proxy; 6.17% margin
$954,013 $58,877 −$11,393
Upside
120% revenue proxy; 9.17% margin
$1,144,816 $104,996 $34,726
How owner involvement changes the scenario result

Annual pre-tax dollars for one modeled mature U.S. Center; the line between markers is the wage-only value attributed to replacing the owner as full-time manager.

Owner-operator benefit versus manager-run residual in three scenarios Conservative owner-operator benefit is 24,205 dollars and manager-run residual is negative 46,065 dollars. Base owner-operator benefit is 58,877 dollars and manager-run residual is negative 11,393 dollars. Upside owner-operator benefit is 104,996 dollars and manager-run residual is 34,726 dollars. −$60k −$10k $40k $90k $120k $0 Conservative −$46k $24k Base −$11k $59k Upside $35k $105k
Estimated owner-operator benefit Manager-run residual after wage proxy

Interpretation: the modeled manager wage is larger than operating benefit in the Conservative and Base cases. An owner filling the manager role may preserve cash, but that difference compensates labor and is not passive profit.

Sources and formula: 2023 Census revenue proxy × scenario margin = owner-operator benefit; manager-run residual = owner-operator benefit − $70,270 BLS wage proxy. Rounded to the nearest dollar after full-precision calculations.

Owner role

Why does active owner operation change the result so much?

Estimated owner-operator benefit is higher because the owner is assumed to perform the full-time Center Manager role rather than purchase that labor in the market. This treatment applies to one modeled mature U.S. Center and is scenario-based. The FDD permits an owner to serve as Center Manager and strongly recommends that arrangement, but it does not report whether owner-managed Centers outperform manager-run Centers.

A manager-run owner still has oversight duties under Item 15, so the model should not be interpreted as passive income. The BLS figure is wage only. Adding employer payroll taxes, benefits, paid leave, hiring costs, and coverage could reduce the manager-run result further. Conversely, a local manager may cost less than the national industry median, which would improve the residual.

Owner-operator effect

The $70,270 gap between each pair of scenario markers is labor value, not an increase in the Center's underlying operating profit. A buyer should separate compensation for hours worked from return on invested capital.

Recurring fees

How much do disclosed recurring franchise-system fees absorb?

At the three modeled revenue levels, the disclosed recurring system-fee burden is approximately $70,045 to $100,573 per year. This is a derived calculation from official 2025 FDD Item 6 fees for a mature Center: a 7% Royalty Fee, a 1% Advertising Fee, a $250 monthly Technology Fee, a $350 monthly Education and Spectrum License Fee, and a $149 monthly Operations Software Expenditure.

Beginning in month 13, royalty is the greater of 7% of Gross Revenues or $1,500 per month. All three modeled revenues are high enough for the 7% calculation to exceed the minimum. The fee chart excludes the proprietary digital marketing program after its required opening phase because participation is described as optional after the third full month of operations. Continuing it for a full year would add approximately $23,964 to $47,964, depending on ad spend.

Disclosed recurring system-fee burden by revenue scenario

Annual dollars; variable fees are 8% of modeled Gross Revenues and fixed fees total $8,988.

Recurring franchise-system fees in three revenue scenarios Conservative scenario fees total 70,045 dollars. Base scenario fees total 85,309 dollars. Upside scenario fees total 100,573 dollars. Each total includes an eight percent variable fee and 8,988 dollars of fixed annual fees. $0 $25k $50k $75k $100k Conservative $70,045 Base $85,309 Upside $100,573
7% royalty + 1% advertising $8,988 annual fixed fees

Interpretation: disclosed system fees consume about 8.8% to 9.2% of modeled revenue before rent, payroll, insurance, supplies, merchant processing, local operating costs, debt principal, or personal taxes.

Source and formula: OsteoStrong Franchising, Inc., 2025 FDD, Item 6, pp. 6–9. Total = modeled revenue × 8% + ($250 + $350 + $149) × 12. Optional mature-period digital marketing and event-driven fees are excluded.

Estimated owner-operator benefit
Cash represented by the external sole-proprietorship net-income proxy after normal business deductions, including a return for owner labor, before personal income taxes and financing principal payments.
Manager-run residual
Estimated owner-operator benefit minus the $70,270 wage-only manager proxy. It excludes additional employer payroll burden and does not eliminate the Managing Owner's oversight duties.
Interest and depreciation
The IRS benchmark includes reported business interest and depreciation within business deductions, but the mix may not match a franchised Center. Capital spending is represented only indirectly through depreciation.
Debt service and taxes
Financing principal and personal income taxes are excluded. Item 10 states that the franchisor does not offer or guarantee financing, so no uniform debt structure is assumed.
Uncertainty

What is the largest unresolved earnings uncertainty?

The largest uncertainty is same-brand unit revenue and expense performance. That uncertainty is official and material forthe current U.S. offer because Item 19 supplies no sales or profit cohort, no average or median, no maturity threshold, and no percentage of Centers achieving a stated result. The external revenue proxy includes gyms, pools, skating rinks, and other facilities that may have different square footage, staffing, pricing, and capital intensity.

The margin proxy is also broad. IRS sole-proprietorship data combine amusement, gambling, and recreation businesses, and the data do not isolate franchised wellness Centers. The all-in margin is therefore used without subtracting disclosed franchise fees a second time. The separate fee chart shows the FDD burden, but the earnings scenarios assume those fees fit within the broader benchmark expense ratio. That compatibility cannot be verified from Item 19.

Buyer verification

What should a buyer verify before relying on any earnings range?

A buyer should replace every external assumption with written same-brand evidence wherever possible. The following checks apply to the current U.S. Center format and should be completed before treating any scenario as decision-grade.

  • Request written Item 19 substantiation or confirm that none exists. The FTC's guide to buying a franchise explains that sales or earnings claims generally belong in Item 19, subject to narrow exceptions.
  • Interview a balanced Item 20 sample. Ask current and former franchisees for annual Gross Revenues, member count, pricing, refunds, payroll, rent, local marketing, manager compensation, owner hours, depreciation, interest, and distributions for comparable mature Centers.
  • Separate owner labor from business return. Ask owner-managers what salary they would need to pay a qualified replacement and ask manager-run owners about payroll taxes, benefits, coverage, and their continuing oversight time.
  • Reconcile every recurring fee. Confirm current royalty minimums, advertising, technology, education, Spectrum licensing, software, payment processing, required local advertising, and whether the proprietary digital marketing program is practically optional after the opening phase.
  • Normalize timing and cohort. Compare mature full-year Centers with the same operating format; do not blend pre-opening, ramp-up, relocated, transferred, or partial-year units with stabilized results.
  • Model financing separately. Use the buyer's actual loan amount, rate, term, fees, and principal schedule. Do not subtract the Item 7 initial investment from one year of sales or call pre-tax operating benefit after-tax take-home pay.
Decision synthesis

What is the strongest defensible OsteoStrong owner-earnings range?

The strongest defensible range from the available evidence is approximately −$46,000 to $35,000 of annual pre-tax manager-run residual, or $24,000 to $105,000 of estimated owner-operator benefit, for one modeled mature U.S. Center. It is scenario-based, not official. The central cases are approximately −$11,000 manager-run and $59,000 owner-operated.

The most important earnings driver is whether unit revenue and margin are sufficient to support a full-time manager after the disclosed system fees and local operating costs. The largest unresolved uncertainty is that the 2025 Item 19 contains no same-brand sales or earnings data. Before proceeding, a buyer should verify comparable full-year Center records, Item 19 substantiation, recurring-fee treatment, owner hours, and replacement-manager cost through written franchisor materials and structured interviews with current and former franchisees.

All figures are annual U.S. dollars and rounded for presentation after calculations using full-precision inputs. Negative values indicate an estimated operating shortfall before financing principal and personal income taxes. No scenario is a forecast, probability, guarantee, or after-tax take-home estimate.