How Much Does a Play It Again Sports Franchise Owner Make?

Get Franchise Bundle
Get Full Bundle:
$79 $49
$99 $79
$49 $29

TOTAL:

Estimated annual owner-operator benefit
$71,000–$342,000

A U.S. Play It Again Sports owner can reasonably model about $71,000 to $342,000 per year in pre-tax owner-operator benefit across the three scenarios below, with a base scenario near $161,000. This is not passive business profit: it includes the estimated value of the owner personally performing the management role required for a first store.

Evidence mode: FDD-anchored scenario Confidence: Limited Format: 3,500–4,000 sq. ft. retail store Performance period: fiscal 2025
Independent estimate

This range is an independent analytical scenario, not an Item 19 financial performance representation by Winmark Corporation. It combines identified facts from the 2026 Play It Again Sports Franchise Disclosure Document with separately identified U.S. Census Bureau, Bureau of Labor Statistics, and editorial operating-cost assumptions. Actual results can differ materially by location, sales mix, inventory sourcing, labor, occupancy, financing, owner involvement, seasonality, and execution.

Data basis checked July 17, 2026
Legal franchisor
Winmark Corporation, a Minnesota corporation. The current U.S. FDD was issued March 16, 2026.
Item 19 status
Official Gross Sales and Gross Profit, but no Operating Profit, EBITDA, Net Income, Owner Compensation, or cash-flow disclosure.
Reporting population
287 of 287 eligible franchised stores in the United States and Canada, each under the same ownership for the full 12 months ended December 27, 2025.
Evidence mode
Mode C: revenue and Gross Profit anchored to the 2026 FDD; remaining operating expenses modeled separately.
Public references
official Play It Again Sports franchise information, Winmark’s 2025 Form 10-K, and the government datasets linked below.
Item 19 evidence

What does Play It Again Sports Item 19 actually report?

Officially, Item 19 reports store revenue and Gross Profit—not owner earnings. For fiscal 2025, the 287-store reporting cohort produced Average Gross Sales of $1,172,630 and Average Gross Profit of $625,208. The FDD defines Gross Profit as Gross Sales minus Cost of Goods Sold, including freight and shrinkage, before rent, payroll, royalty, advertising, software, insurance, utilities, and other operating expenses.

The cohort is broad but not purely U.S.-only: it combines U.S. and Canadian franchised stores. The FDD states that the two groups did not have material operating differences for this representation, but it does not publish separate U.S. sales or Gross Profit. The figures are cited from the 2026 FDD, Item 19, pages 38–41; no matching public official FDD link was verified.

$1,172,630
Average Gross Sales
OFFICIAL. Revenue for the 287-store fiscal 2025 cohort; not owner income.
$1,014,764
Median Gross Sales
OFFICIAL. The median is about $157,866 below the average, showing upward skew.
$625,208
Average Gross Profit
OFFICIAL. After Cost of Goods Sold only; normal store operating costs remain.
53.32%
Average Gross Profit percentage
OFFICIAL. Average Gross Profit divided by compatible Average Gross Sales.
287 / 287
Eligible stores reporting
OFFICIAL. Full coverage of the eligible same-owner, full-year cohort.
40%
At or above the average
OFFICIAL. 114 stores attained or exceeded both reported system averages.
How did fiscal 2025 sales and Gross Profit vary by quartile?

Official FDD averages for each sales quartile; quartiles are observed cohorts, not probabilities for a new store.

Play It Again Sports average Gross Sales and average Gross Profit by fiscal 2025 sales quartile Four paired horizontal bars compare average Gross Sales and average Gross Profit. The fourth quartile averages 533,437 dollars sales and 300,086 dollars Gross Profit. The third quartile averages 869,473 and 481,916. The second quartile averages 1,195,720 and 637,132. The top quartile averages 2,104,837 and 1,088,127. $0 $0.5M $1.0M $1.5M $2.0M Fourth quartile $533,437 $300,086 Third quartile $869,473 $481,916 Second quartile $1,195,720 $637,132 Top quartile $2,104,837 $1,088,127
Average Gross Sales Average Gross Profit

Interpretation: higher-sales cohorts generated more Gross Profit dollars, but the Gross Profit percentage declined from 56.26% in the fourth quartile to 51.70% in the top quartile. Source: 2026 Play It Again Sports FDD, Item 19, page 40; the official franchise page also publishes the top-quartile figures.

Revenue is not earnings

The Federal Trade Commission warns that Gross Sales do not reveal actual profit because rent, payroll, and other overhead can absorb a large share of revenue. That distinction is especially important here because the FDD’s Gross Profit stops after Cost of Goods Sold. See the FTC’s consumer guide to evaluating franchise earnings.

Scenario model

How was the annual owner-earnings range estimated?

The estimate starts with compatible FDD Gross Sales and Gross Profit, then subtracts recurring store costs that Item 19 omits. The Conservative scenario uses the fourth-quartile FDD averages, the Base scenario uses the total-system FDD averages, and the Upside scenario uses the top-quartile FDD averages. These anchors are official historical cohort statistics, but the expense ratios below are analytical assumptions rather than franchisor-reported results.

Estimated manager-run residual = Gross Profit − labor and payroll burden − royalty − required advertising − fixed recurring fees − other operating costs
Estimated owner-operator benefit = manager-run residual + market value of the management labor performed by the owner
  • FDD revenue and Gross Profit anchors: $533,437 and $300,086 for Conservative; $1,172,630 and $625,208 for Base; $2,104,837 and $1,088,127 for Upside.
  • Recurring franchise obligations: 5% Continuing Fee, a 5% combined cooperative/local advertising minimum, $1,500 annual Marketing Fee, and $295 monthly Software Fee. The $5,040 fixed total annualizes the current Software Fee for a steady-state year. Source: 2026 FDD, Item 6, pages 7–11.
  • Labor and payroll burden: 30%, 22%, and 18% of sales across the three scenarios. The 2023 U.S. Census Bureau Annual Integrated Economic Survey reported $58.026 billion of sales and $7.147 billion of annual payroll for NAICS 451110 Sporting Goods Stores, a derived wage-payroll ratio of 12.3%. The model uses higher all-in labor assumptions to allow for payroll taxes, benefits, management coverage, and small-store staffing variance. The uplift is editorial.
  • Other operating costs: 17%, 14%, and 11% of sales. These editorial assumptions combine occupancy, utilities, insurance, repairs, payment processing, supplies, professional services, and routine local overhead not disclosed in Item 19.
  • Owner management value: $79,930, the May 2023 BLS annual mean wage for General and Operations Managers in Sporting Goods, Hobby, and Musical Instrument Retailers. It is an employee wage benchmark, not an owner salary promise and not fully loaded compensation.
Scenario FDD revenue anchor Manager-run residual Owner-operator benefit
Conservative
Fourth-quartile averages; 30% labor; 17% other costs
$533,437 -$9,013 $70,917
Base
System averages; 22% labor; 14% other costs
$1,172,630 $80,758 $160,688
Upside
Top-quartile averages; 18% labor; 11% other costs
$2,104,837 $262,201 $342,131

Calculations use full-precision inputs and round final dollar values to the nearest dollar. Quartile anchors describe past FDD cohorts; they are not assigned probabilities and the Base scenario is not presented as the most likely result.

How much does the owner’s management labor change the result?

The distance between each pair of markers is $79,930, the BLS management-wage proxy added back when the owner replaces that paid role.

Manager-run residual versus owner-operator benefit in three scenarios The Conservative scenario moves from negative 9,013 dollars manager-run residual to 70,917 dollars owner-operator benefit. The Base scenario moves from 80,758 to 160,688. The Upside scenario moves from 262,201 to 342,131. -$25k $0 $100k $200k $300k $400k Conservative -$9,013 $70,917 Base $80,758 $160,688 Upside $262,201 $342,131
Residual after a paid manager Owner-operator benefit

Interpretation: active ownership matters because Item 15 requires a first-store principal owner to personally manage the business. The owner-operator figure includes compensation for that labor; it should not be read as passive distributions. Manager wage source: BLS May 2023 industry-specific wage estimates.

Owner role

Can a first Play It Again Sports store be manager-run?

Not as an absentee model under the 2026 FDD. Item 15 states that an individual franchisee must personally manage the franchised business and that operation of the store must be the owner’s primary job responsibility. A corporate or partnership franchisee must designate an individual with at least 50% of the equity and voting interest who personally manages the store. This requirement applies to the first store; an owner operating multiple stores may delegate management of additional stores to managers.

That structure changes the meaning of “earnings.” For a first store, the most decision-useful figure is owner-operator benefit: residual store economics plus the value of management labor performed by the owner. For an additional manager-run unit, the more relevant figure is the residual after a normal manager expense. The model does not call the $79,930 labor value pure profit because it compensates the owner for work.

Owner-operator effect

In the Conservative scenario, the store produces a modeled manager-run loss of about $9,000 but an owner-operator benefit of about $71,000 after recognizing the owner’s management labor. This does not make the store economically risk-free; it shows how an owner can substitute personal labor for a paid position. If the owner must hire substantial management coverage anyway, the benefit can move back toward the manager-run result.

Revenue-to-benefit bridge

What expenses separate Gross Profit from owner earnings?

In the Base scenario, $625,208 of official Average Gross Profit becomes about $80,758 of manager-run residual or $160,688 of owner-operator benefit. The largest modeled deductions are labor, other operating costs, and the combined 10% royalty-and-advertising burden.

Base-scenario bridge Amount Evidence treatment
Average Gross Profit $625,208 OFFICIAL FDD fact; after Cost of Goods Sold only
Labor and payroll burden -$257,979 SCENARIO: 22% of Average Gross Sales
Continuing Fee -$58,632 OFFICIAL FDD: 5% of Gross Sales
Cooperative/local advertising -$58,632 OFFICIAL FDD: modeled at current 5% minimum
Marketing and Software Fees -$5,040 DERIVED: $1,500 + 12 × $295
Other operating costs -$164,168 SCENARIO: 14% of sales
Manager-run residual $80,758 DERIVED scenario result
Owner management labor add-back +$79,930 BENCHMARK: BLS employee wage proxy
Owner-operator benefit $160,688 DERIVED scenario result

The displayed line items are rounded; the totals use full-precision calculations. The model excludes financing interest and principal, depreciation, capital expenditures, modernization reserves, and personal income taxes. It also excludes the currently $0 Technology Fee. If Winmark establishes the FDD-estimated $500–$2,500 annual Technology Fee, or raises the total advertising requirement from 5% to 6%, owner benefit would be lower.

The 2026 FDD’s initial investment of $346,300 to $459,700 is startup capital, not an annual operating expense, and is therefore not subtracted from one year of sales. Debt service must be modeled separately based on the buyer’s actual financed amount, rate, and term.

Evidence quality

How much confidence should a buyer place in this range?

Evidence confidence
Limited

The current FDD supplies strong same-brand sales, Gross Profit, cohort, and fee evidence, but the final owner-benefit range still relies materially on external payroll data and editorial assumptions for occupancy and other operating costs.

The strongest part of the analysis is the FDD revenue and Gross Profit distribution; the weakest part is the operating-expense bridge. Several limitations materially affect interpretation:

  • Mixed geography: Item 19 combines U.S. and Canadian stores. Winmark states there are no material operating differences for the representation, but it does not disclose a U.S.-only sales or Gross Profit table.
  • Average versus median: Average Gross Sales of $1,172,630 exceeds Median Gross Sales of $1,014,764. Only 40% of stores attained or exceeded the average, so the average should not be described as typical.
  • Eligibility exclusions: the 287-store cohort excludes 22 stores that opened or transferred during fiscal 2025. New-store ramp-up and transfer economics are therefore not captured.
  • No company-store proxy: Item 20 and Winmark’s Form 10-K show zero company-owned Play It Again Sports stores, so there is no same-brand corporate operating-profit benchmark to fill the gap.
  • Industry mismatch: Census NAICS 451110 primarily covers new sporting goods retail, while Play It Again Sports sells both used and new goods and buys inventory from consumers. The payroll benchmark is directionally relevant, not economically identical.
  • Wage timing: the owner-labor proxy uses May 2023 industry-specific BLS data because it provides the closest directly matched occupation-and-industry estimate. Local 2026 compensation can be higher or lower.

Item 20 provides useful context rather than proof of profitability. The system ended fiscal 2025 with 309 franchised stores—274 in the United States and 35 in Canada—and no company-owned stores. The U.S. count rose from 265 to 274 during the year, with 15 openings and six terminations. Those population changes do not reveal the economics of individual stores.

Buyer verification

What should a buyer verify before relying on the estimate?

A buyer should replace every modeled expense ratio with evidence from comparable Play It Again Sports stores. The FDD says Winmark maintains written substantiation for Item 19 and will provide it on reasonable request. The most useful diligence is a store-level profit-and-loss bridge that preserves the same definitions used in Item 19.

  • Request Item 19 written substantiation and confirm how Gross Sales, Cost of Goods Sold, freight, shrinkage, and Gross Profit are calculated.
  • Ask franchisees in the same sales quartile for payroll, payroll taxes, benefits, rent, common-area charges, utilities, card fees, insurance, repairs, and local administrative costs as percentages of sales.
  • Separate owner wages, draws, distributions, retained earnings, and business profit. Ask how many hours the principal owner works and which paid roles that owner replaces.
  • Compare mature same-owner stores with new, transferred, and recently remodeled locations rather than assuming the 287-store cohort represents ramp-up performance.
  • Verify whether the local advertising obligation is 5% or has been increased, whether a cooperative applies, and whether a North American Ad Fund or Technology Fee is in effect.
  • Model interest, principal payments, working-capital needs, inventory seasonality, and capital expenditures separately from operating earnings.
  • Interview both current and former franchisees listed in Item 20 and ask for dollar results, not only sales growth or Gross Profit percentages.
Decision synthesis

What is the strongest defensible earnings takeaway?

The strongest defensible range is approximately $71,000 to $342,000 in annual pre-tax owner-operator benefit for one mature store under the stated scenarios. It is scenario-based, not an official earnings claim. The corresponding manager-run residual ranges from about a $9,000 loss to $262,000 before financing, depreciation, capital expenditures, and personal taxes.

The most important earnings driver is the combination of sales volume and labor efficiency after Gross Profit. The largest unresolved uncertainty is that Item 19 does not disclose store operating expenses or owner compensation, while its performance cohort mixes U.S. and Canadian stores. Before using the range in an investment decision, a buyer should verify Item 19 substantiation, obtain comparable-store operating expense data, and test the assumptions through franchisee interviews.