How Much Does an Assisted Living Locators Franchise Owner Make?

Get Franchise Bundle
Get Full Bundle:
$79 $49
$99 $79
$49 $29

TOTAL:

Estimated annual owner-operator benefit

$34,500–$61,000

A full-time Assisted Living Locators owner with one territory may produce roughly $34,500 to $61,000 in estimated pre-tax owner-operator benefit under the scenario model below, with a base case of about $47,000. The 2026 FDD reports revenue, not profit or owner compensation.

Evidence mode: Mode C Confidence: Limited Format: Home-based, one territory Period: 2025 revenue evidence
Independent estimate. This range is an analytical scenario, not an Item 19 financial performance representation by ALL Franchising, LLC. It combines 2026 FDD facts with a separately identified IRS industry benchmark and explicit modeling assumptions. Actual results can differ materially because of territory demand, placements, invoicing and collections, referral relationships, local regulation, labor, marketing, vehicle and insurance costs, financing, owner involvement, and execution.

Data basis and evidence status

Legal franchisor: ALL Franchising, LLC. FDD: issued April 24, 2026. Item 19: calendar-year 2025 Gross Invoiced Revenue and Gross Collected Revenue for 106 “Qualifying Franchisees” that operated throughout the year and had a full-time active owner. Company-owned businesses, 11 passive franchisees, and 21 franchisees that opened during 2025 were excluded. Benchmark: IRS 2023 nonfarm sole-proprietorship results for the broad Social Assistance sector. Checked: July 18, 2026.

The FDD is the controlling source for brand-specific figures and obligations. The official Assisted Living Locators U.S. franchise website provides current brand context, but website summaries may not match the latest FDD terms.

Direct earnings answer

How much may a one-territory owner earn annually?

The defensible analytical range is approximately $34,500 to $61,000 per year, before personal income taxes and financing principal. This is an estimated owner-operator benefit for a full-time owner of one home-based territory, not an official earnings figure. The model uses the 2025 one-territory median Gross Collected Revenue of $128,047 as its center and tests lower and higher revenue and margin conditions.

The base scenario produces $46,962, rounded to about $47,000. Because the IRS sole-proprietorship benchmark does not deduct a salary paid to the proprietor, this amount can contain two economically different components: residual business profit and compensation for the owner’s full-time labor. It should not be described as passive income.

Estimated one-territory owner-operator benefit

Scenario revenue multiplied by a broad Social Assistance net-margin sensitivity.

Conservative, base, and upside annual owner-operator benefit scenarios Three columns show approximately 34,496 dollars, 46,962 dollars, and 60,964 dollars. $0 $20k $40k $60k $34,496 $46,962 $60,964 Conservative Base Upside

Interpretation: The $26,468 spread is driven by both collected-revenue variation and a six-percentage-point margin range. Sources: 2026 FDD, Item 19, pp. 40–42; IRS nonfarm sole-proprietorship statistics, tax year 2023. Figures are independent scenarios rounded only for presentation.

Scenario Gross Collected Revenue Net-margin assumption Estimated benefit
Conservative $102,438 33.7% $34,496
Base $128,047 36.7% $46,962
Upside $153,656 39.7% $60,964
Revenue is not earnings Item 19’s $128,047 one-territory median is money collected by the business, not owner salary, profit, distributions, or take-home pay. The FDD expressly states that its financial performance representation contains no expense information.

Item 19 evidence

What does the 2026 FDD actually measure?

The official disclosure measures 2025 Gross Invoiced Revenue and Gross Collected Revenue, not profit. It covers full-year, actively owner-managed franchisees and separates them by territory count. For one-territory franchisees, median Gross Collected Revenue was $128,047 and average Gross Collected Revenue was $180,686.

The average is materially above the median, and only 30 of 83 one-territory franchisees—36.1%—achieved or surpassed the average. That makes the median a more conservative central anchor for an earnings scenario. The Item 19 source data were franchisee financial reports and were not audited.

Official $128,047 One-territory median collected revenue

Calendar 2025; 83 qualifying franchisees.

Official $180,686 One-territory average collected revenue

The average exceeds the median by $52,639.

Official 36.1% Reached or exceeded the average

30 of 83 one-territory franchisees.

Official 106 Qualifying franchisees

Full-year, non-passive operators across 134 territories.

Benchmark 36.7% IRS Social Assistance net margin

2023 Schedule C net income less deficit divided by receipts.

Derived $30,120 Known mature annual fee floor

Current minimum royalty, Brand Fund, local marketing, and estimated technology.

Median versus average collected revenue by territory count

Official Item 19 results for full-year, actively owner-managed franchisees in 2025.

Median and average Gross Collected Revenue for one-territory and two-territory franchisees One territory had a median of 128,047 dollars and average of 180,686 dollars. Two territories had a median of 140,769 dollars and average of 223,091 dollars. $0 $60k $120k $180k $240k 1 territory 2 territories $128,047 $180,686 $140,769 $223,091
Median Average

Interpretation: Two-territory ownership did not double the disclosed central revenue result: its median was only $12,722, or 9.9%, above the one-territory median. Portfolio economics cannot be estimated by simply multiplying one-territory earnings. Source: 2026 FDD, Item 19, pp. 40–42.

Gross Invoiced Revenue
Gross sums invoiced or charged in connection with the business, subject to the FDD’s stated exclusions. It can exceed cash actually received.
Gross Collected Revenue
The amount of Gross Invoiced Revenue actually collected. The FDD warns that collected revenue may be materially lower than invoiced revenue.
Qualifying Franchisee
A franchisee that operated for the full January 1–December 31, 2025 measuring period and was not classified as passive.
Estimated owner-operator benefit
For this article, an analytical pre-tax amount after normal operating expenses and recurring fees, before personal income taxes and financing principal. It may include compensation for the owner’s labor.

The Federal Trade Commission’s franchise-buying guide cautions that gross sales do not reveal actual costs or profits and recommends reviewing sample size, the percentage achieving an average, and written substantiation.

Scenario method

How was the owner-earnings range calculated?

The estimate multiplies a one-territory collected-revenue scenario by a broad official net-margin benchmark. The result is derived independently for a 2025 full-year, owner-operated territory. It is not reported by the franchisor and carries limited confidence because Item 19 contains no expense data.

Revenue anchor

The center is the official one-territory median Gross Collected Revenue of $128,047. Because Item 19 gives no quartiles, the conservative and upside revenue cases use 80% and 120% of that median: $102,438 and $153,656. That spread is an editorial sensitivity, not an FDD distribution.

Margin anchor

IRS tax-year 2023 Schedule C data report $25.655 billion of receipts and $9.409 billion of net income less deficit for the broad Social Assistance sector, a 36.7% ratio. The scenarios use 33.7%, 36.7%, and 39.7%, a ±3 percentage-point sensitivity.

  • Formula: Gross Collected Revenue × scenario net margin = estimated pre-tax owner-operator benefit.
  • Benchmark scope: The IRS Social Assistance sector is broader than senior-living placement and includes businesses with different labor, facility, and cost structures. The Census definition of NAICS 6241 Individual and Family Services shows why the proxy is directionally relevant but not brand-specific.
  • Fee treatment: The IRS ratio is an all-in net-income measure, so FDD fees are not subtracted a second time. The separate fee-floor analysis below is a reasonableness check, not an additional deduction.
  • Owner and manager compensation: The owner-led scenarios do not deduct a wage for the proprietor, so part of the result compensates the owner’s labor. Manager compensation is excluded from those three scenarios and tested separately below.
  • Debt, taxes, and capital spending: No personal income tax or financing principal is estimated. Capital expenditures are not modeled as separate annual cash outflows and must be assessed for the buyer’s actual equipment and vehicle plan.
  • Depreciation and interest: The IRS sector result reflects the deduction mix reported by sole proprietors, which may include depreciation and deductible interest. An individual franchisee’s accounting and financing profile can differ materially.

How much of median revenue is absorbed by known recurring obligations?

At the one-territory median, the derived mature annual floor for four disclosed obligations is $30,120. This is an official-FDD-based calculation for month 37 and later, but it is not a complete expense budget. It excludes call-center charges, insurance, vehicle and travel, phone, accounting, conference costs, additional marketing, payroll, and other operating expenses.

Recurring obligation FDD term used Annual amount
Royalty Fee Greater of 8% of Gross Invoiced Revenue or $1,400 per month after month 36 $16,800
Brand Fund Fee Greater of 2% of Gross Invoiced Revenue or current $300 monthly minimum $3,600
Local Marketing Commitment $500 per month after the opening-period step-up $6,000
Technology Fee Current estimate of $310 per month for the anticipated license mix $3,720
Known mature floor Before other operating expenses $30,120

At the 2025 one-territory median Gross Invoiced Revenue of $139,567, the mature royalty and Brand Fund minimums exceed their percentage calculations. The $30,120 floor equals 21.6% of median invoiced revenue and 23.5% of median collected revenue. The Brand Fund minimum can increase, and percentage fees take over at higher revenue levels. Source: 2026 FDD, Item 6, pp. 13–16.

Fee-floor limitation The fee floor is not a profit bridge. It proves that a meaningful portion of revenue is committed before call center, insurance, vehicle, professional services, additional marketing, staffing, and other costs are considered.

Owner role

How does full-time owner involvement change the result?

Full-time owner involvement is part of the current operating model, not an optional earnings enhancement. Item 15 requires a Responsible Owner to devote full-time efforts and remain actively involved even when managers are hired. Item 19 also excludes passive franchisees because their operations were considered materially different from the current offer.

That requirement is why the scenario is labeled owner-operator benefit. Replacing the owner’s labor with a paid manager is not a valid passive-ownership scenario under the current FDD. A manager may assist the full-time Responsible Owner, but that added payroll can consume the modeled benefit.

Owner-led benefit versus adding a full-time manager

Illustrative subtraction of the $74,710 May 2024 BLS median wage for social and community service managers in individual and family services.

Effect of an illustrative full-time manager wage on the three owner-operator benefit scenarios Owner-led benefits of 34,496 dollars, 46,962 dollars, and 60,964 dollars become negative 40,214 dollars, negative 27,748 dollars, and negative 13,746 dollars after subtracting a 74,710 dollar manager wage. $0 −$50k $70k Conservative Base Upside −$40,214 $34,496 −$27,748 $46,962 −$13,746 $60,964
Owner-led benefit After manager wage

Interpretation: In all three scenarios, adding the illustrative manager wage creates a negative residual before employer payroll taxes, benefits, or other incremental staffing costs. This does not prove every manager-assisted outlet loses money; it shows that the current revenue-centered model has little room for a full replacement salary. Sources: 2026 FDD, Item 15, p. 37; BLS Social and Community Service Managers, May 2024 wage data.

Owner-operator effect Part of the $34,500–$61,000 range is compensation for work the Responsible Owner performs. It is not pure business profit and should not be compared directly with passive investment returns.

Uncertainty

What could move actual owner earnings outside the range?

The largest unresolved uncertainty is the outlet-level expense structure. That conclusion is uncertain but unavoidable because the 2026 Item 19 contains no payroll, marketing, call-center, vehicle, insurance, bad-debt, or other expense data for the reporting population.

Factors that can reduce owner benefit

Slow placement volume, delayed or uncollected invoices, high local lead costs, additional staff, extensive driving, larger insurance expense, professional-service costs, debt service, and state referral-fee restrictions can push results below the conservative scenario.

Factors that can increase owner benefit

Higher placement volume, strong hospital and provider referral relationships, timely collections, disciplined local marketing, low staffing, and a home-based cost structure can move results above the base case. The FDD does not quantify each driver’s effect.

Collection quality matters. The one-territory median Gross Invoiced Revenue was $139,567, while median Gross Collected Revenue was $128,047—a difference of $11,520. Across the median figures, approximately 91.7% of invoiced revenue was collected, although the two medians may not describe the same individual outlet. Buyer diligence should therefore examine invoice aging and collection timing, not just placements booked.

System composition also changed during 2025. Item 20 reports 24 franchised territory openings, 12 terminations, and three non-renewals, ending the year with 170 franchised territories. These counts do not establish profitability, but they are relevant context for interviewing current and former franchisees. Source: 2026 FDD, Item 20, pp. 42–48.

Buyer verification

What should a buyer verify before relying on this range?

A buyer should replace the broad scenario assumptions with current, territory-relevant operating evidence. The range is estimated for a one-territory, full-time owner and remains limited until actual franchisee profit-and-loss statements or written Item 19 substantiation clarify the missing expense variables.

  • Request the written substantiation supporting 2026 FDD Item 19 and confirm that the one-territory median and average calculations remain unchanged after any amendment.
  • Ask several one-territory franchisees for 2025 and trailing-12-month Gross Invoiced Revenue, Gross Collected Revenue, collection lag, bad debt, and placement count.
  • Obtain actual annual spending for Royalty Fee, Brand Fund Fee, Local Marketing Commitment, technology, call center, insurance, vehicle, conferences, accounting, and additional lead generation.
  • Separate owner labor from residual business profit by recording weekly owner hours and the roles performed by any employee or manager.
  • Interview former franchisees listed in Item 20 about revenue ramp, staffing, collections, transfer or closure circumstances, and whether confidentiality restrictions limit what they can discuss.
  • Model debt service separately using the buyer’s real loan amount, interest rate, amortization term, fees, and required working capital; do not deduct the initial investment from one year of revenue.
  • Confirm state-specific rules governing senior-community referral or placement fees and transportation practices for the proposed territory.

Decision synthesis

What is the strongest defensible earnings view?

The strongest defensible view is a scenario-based annual owner-operator benefit of about $34,500 to $61,000 for one full-time, home-based territory, with a $47,000 base case. It is not official owner earnings; the official 2026 FDD evidence is revenue-only.

The most important earnings driver is Gross Collected Revenue, which depends on placement volume and the conversion of invoiced referral fees into cash. The largest uncertainty is the missing outlet-level expense data, especially owner labor, additional staffing, marketing, call center, vehicle, insurance, and local operating costs. Before making a decision, a buyer should verify Item 19 substantiation, compare actual one-territory profit-and-loss statements, and interview current and former franchisees about collections, workload, staffing, and cash flow.